Which entities may not be involved in the IRB review process?

In the context of the Institutional Review Board (IRB) review process, it is essential to maintain objectivity and protect the integrity of the review from any conflicts of interest. The IRB is tasked with ensuring that research involving human subjects is conducted ethically and that participants' rights and wellbeing are prioritized.

The research staff may have a vested interest in the outcomes of the studies they conduct, potentially leading to bias during the review process. Their familiarity with the project details could cloud objective judgment.

Similarly, involving study participants in the review process can compromise the integrity of the IRB's operations. Participants may have personal stakes or emotional connections to the study that could influence their perspectives, making it challenging for them to engage in unbiased review.

Lastly, the institution's financial department, while crucial to the overall functioning of the research, may have economic interests or concerns that could conflict with the ethical considerations the IRB is bound to prioritize. Financial considerations should not overshadow participant rights, safety, or ethical concerns.

Thus, the IRB must be composed of individuals who can remain impartial and evaluate the research proposals solely based on ethical guidelines and participant welfare, which limits the involvement of these specific groups in the review process. This is why the answer indicating that all mentioned entities