When conducting an expedited review, which action could a reviewer NOT take?

In an expedited review, the primary focus is on studies that present minimal risk to participants and meet specific criteria set by regulatory authorities. The reviewer has certain limitations in their ability to influence the research study.

Offering approvals based on extensive data is not an option during an expedited review because this type of review is meant for studies that do not require a comprehensive review of extensive data. Instead, expedited reviews typically focus on straightforward studies where the risks are minimal and do not involve complex or extensive data that necessitates a deeper evaluation. The expedited process is designed for efficiency and swifter turnaround times, which means that reviewers typically rely on already established data and documentation rather than embarking on a detailed examination of extensive additional data.

In contrast, reviewers can request changes to the research, disapprove the research if it doesn't meet ethical standards, and make recommendations for informed consent as part of their responsibility to ensure participant protection.