Is it true that some researchers may have delays attributable to lack of required information in submissions?

The correct response is based on the reality of research processes, particularly within the context of human research protection. Researchers often face delays in their projects due to incomplete or insufficient information provided in submissions, such as research protocols, informed consent documents, or study designs. These submissions typically undergo rigorous review by institutional review boards (IRBs) or ethics committees, which require comprehensive details to ensure that the rights and welfare of participants are protected.

If the initial submission lacks critical information, the review process can be significantly hampered, leading to delays as researchers may need to revise and resubmit their documents. This iterative process can slow down the overall timeline for initiating research activities. Therefore, it is indeed true that the lack of required information in submissions can lead to delays for researchers, highlighting the importance of thorough preparation and attention to detail in research documentation.